highest state of happiness

One correctly said to him: Plaisir is a direction of moreness. Each time you feel the pleasure, you will find the word moreness covers the case. It will low cover the state of the pleasure, the pleasure of consumption.You become more by adapting with yourself part of the Not-Individual, food. You will find it true the highest state of happiness, union with the supreme one. You become more while increasing yourselves with its infinite.

When you have an expression which can be applied to low and highest with what you occupy yourselves, you can be rather sure it all is included, and that, therefore, pleasure is moreness is a true report/ratio. In the same way, the pain is lessness .If you include/understand these things your philosophy of the life will become more practical, and you will be able to help indeed the people who fall into bad manners. Drink of catch. The true attraction of drinking is in the fact that, in the first phases of it, a sharper and sharper life is felt.

This stage is exceeded in the case of the man who becomes drunk, and then attraction ceases. Attraction is in the first phases, and much of people tested that, which would never dream to become drunk.Observe the people who take the wine and see how much more animated and chatterer they become. There attraction, the danger is. True attraction under the majority of the rough forms of excess is that they give an additional direction of the life, and you will be able to never repurchase a man of its excess unless you know why it does it.Including/understanding the attraction of the first stage, the increase in the life, then you will be able to put your finger on the point of temptation, and meet that in your argument with him. So that this kind of mental analysis is not only interesting, but practically useful to each assistance of humanity.More than you know, the more is your power to help large.

The next question which emerges is: Pourquoi made it not divides all the feelings into pleasant and not-pleasant, rather than in painful and not-painful ? Occidental will not be with a loss to answer that: Oh, the Hindu one is naturally so much very pessimistic, that he is unaware of the pleasure naturally and speaks about painful and not-painful.The universe is full with the pain. But that do not be a true answer. Initially the Hindu one is not pessimistic.

It is most optimistic of the men. It does not have a solitary school of philosophy which does not put in its foreground that the object of all philosophy is to put a term to make suffer. But it is deeply reasonable. It knows that we do not need to go to seek approximately happiness. It is already with us, because it is the gasoline of our own nature.Upanishads did not indicate: Individu is happiness ? Happiness exists eternal on your premise. It is your normal state. You have not to seek it. You will be necessarily happy if you d颡rassez yourselves obstacles called the pain, which are in modes of spirit.